Entries Tagged as ''

Don’t Miss Forsman at Booth 958!

Carolyn Forsman, jewelry designer and longtime supporter of the Freedom to Read Foundation, is exhibiting at Midwinter in Booth 958, North Exhibit Hall, Level 4, Washington State Convention & Trade Center. Come by and see her wonderfully whimsical creations. You’re guaranteed to find something you’ll love-and have never seen before! And you’ll be supporting the only organization-FTRF-created specifically to defend intellectual freedom in libraries through the legal system.

Carolyn’s conversation piece jewelry is sold in over 100 museum shops. She has been selling her jewelry at ALA conferences and contributing all proceeds to the Foundation for over 20 years.

Exhibits open Friday, January 19, 5:30-7:30 p.m. They reopen Saturday, January 20, and Sunday, January 21, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. The exhibits open 9:00 a.m. and close at 2:00 p.m. on Monday, January 22.

Don’t Miss Hearing Author Chris Crutcher in Seattle!

Don’t miss hearing Chris Crutcher speak at the fundraiser for the Freedom to Read Foundation (FTRF) on Sunday, January 21, 2007, at the Seattle Public Library. The event is being held in conjunction with the 2007 American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, and is sponsored, in part, by HarperCollins.

The suggested donation to attend the event is $25. Space is limited. Refreshments will be provided, beginning at 5:45 p.m., when the doors open. Chris will begin his talk at 6:30 p.m., and sign books immediately following. Copies of Chris’ books will be on sale; all sales proceeds will benefit FTRF.

  • You may use the secure online donation form to donate now.
  • Please indicate in the comments section that the donation is to attend the Chris Crutcher Fundraiser.
  • You may call the Freedom to Read Foundation office with your credit card information. Call (800) 545-2433 x4226.
  • Donations (by cash, checks, or credit card) also will be accepted at the event based on space availability.

For more information, visit the FTRF Web site or contact Jonathan Kelley at jokelley@ala.org or (800) 545-2433 x4226. Visit Chris’ home page to learn more about his life and work.

Free People Weed Freely?

I found this blog posting with reference to a Washington Post article on the weeding system set up at the Fairfax County Public Library system, and it struck me that perhaps the blogger here is being a bit inflammatory by conflating weeding with censorship in his title ["Must We Burn Faulkner?"].

His post got me thinking about issues of censorship and material selection, and particularly how some folks equate their desire to remove an “objectional” book/magazine/DVD from a library with librarians’ decisions to select for and weed book collections.

Weeding is certainly a big topic in the library world. I’m interested to know whether librarians out there have encountered this conflation in their systems, with the public, etc. How have you dealt with the issue?

For some background on collection development, weeding, and censorship, check out Lester Asheim’s seminal article, “Not Censorship But Selection,” June Pinnell-Stephens’ 2002 article on Asheim’s 1953 article, ALA’s interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights on Evaluating Library Collections, and a bibliography on the topic.

And just for fun, Pop Goes the Librarian has a posting on the Fairfax article, and also discusses the Maplewood, N.J., library’s efforts to deal with the issue of those rowdy kids by shutting down during afternoons (another issue with intellectual freedom implications). (Hat tip, h20boro lib blog.)

UPDATE: Fairfax County posted their response to the article and the ensuing donnybrook on their blog on Friday. As they put it:

Recent media reports that claim our library system is eliminating all copies of classic literature from our shelves are absolutely incorrect. Although we occasionally reduce the number of copies of a particular title — perhaps trimming Hemingway’s For Whom the Bell Tolls from 110 copies to 108, for example — we’re committed to offering classic texts by western culture’s leading authors.

Also on a link from their main page.

Privacy Lost and Regained Part II

A story today from CNN, Bush signing may mean government can read your mail, notes that “the signing statement attached to postal legislation by President Bush last month may have opened the way for the government to open mail without a warrant.” The full signing statement said:

“The executive branch shall construe subsection 404(c) of title 39, as enacted by subsection 1010(e) of the act, which provides for opening of an item of a class of mail otherwise sealed against inspection, in a manner consistent, to the maximum extent permissible, with the need to conduct searches in exigent circumstances, such as to protect human life and safety against hazardous materials, and the need for physical searches specifically authorized by law for foreign intelligence collection.”

Bob Sullivan, Technology correspondent, MSNB, has written a multipart story on Privacy Lost.  During his investigations, he discovered privacy only matters sometimes to Americans.  He writes that they feel the same way about privacy as they feel about health:

“When you have it, you don’t notice it. Only when it’s gone do you wish you’d done more to protect it.”

Protecting user privacy and confidentiality has long been an integral part of the mission of libraries. The American Library Association has affirmed a right to privacy since 1939. Existing ALA policies affirm that confidentiality is crucial to freedom of inquiry. Rights to privacy and confidentiality also are implicit in the Library Bill of Rights’ guarantee of free access to library resources for all users.

As ALA’s Privacy: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights points out:

Privacy is essential to the exercise of free speech, free thought, and free association. The courts have established a First Amendment right to receive information in a publicly funded library. Further, the courts have upheld the right to privacy based on the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution. Many states provide guarantees of privacy in their constitutions and statute law. Numerous decisions in case law have defined and extended rights to privacy.

In a library (physical or virtual), the right to privacy is the right to open inquiry without having the subject of one’s interest examined or scrutinized by others. Confidentiality exists when a library is in possession of personally identifiable information about users and keeps that information private on their behalf.

Discover ways to protect privacy and confidentiality with these resources:

Guidelines for Developing a Library Privacy Policy

Privacy: An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights

Policy Concerning Confidentiality of Personally Identifiable Information about Library Users

Policy on Confidentiality of Library Records

Resolution on Privacy and Standardized Driver’s Licenses and Personal Identification Cards

Resolution on the Retention of Library Usage Records

Resolution on the Terrorism Information Awareness Program

RFID in Libraries: Privacy and Confidentiality Guidelines

See also Privacy and Confidentiality; see also Intellectual Freedom Issues and State Privacy Laws regarding Library Records; see also Privacy Tool Kit

See also Bruce Schneier’s article The Eternal Value of Privacy, in which Schneier points out:

“Cardinal Richelieu understood the value of surveillance when he famously said, ‘If one would give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest man, I would find something in them to have him hanged.’ Watch someone long enough, and you’ll find something to arrest—or just blackmail—with. Privacy is important because without it, surveillance information will be abused: to peep, to sell to marketers and to spy on political enemies—whoever they happen to be at the time.”

See also Surveillance in America and Privacy and Confidentiality.

See also FBI director wants ISPs to track users, Government Drops Demand for Library RecordsSurveillance in America, Shredding the Fourth Amendment, and USA PATRIOT Act and Intellectual Freedom.

See also Help for Librarians Receiving Law Enforcement Requests.

Revised from post Privacy Lost and Regained.

Stickam & Second Life

Following up on Don’s post earlier today, there’s a good post up on YALSA’s blog regarding Stickam, which the New York Times (and I) just discovered this week.

It’s a “trend” story, which the Times loves. The key quote is from Parry Aftab:

“The only thing you get from the combination of Web cams and young people are problems.”

The use of the word “only” is highly disconcerting, particularly if you look at the site and think about the many, many positive ways in which Web cams could be used by young people (like video cameras, cameras, tape recorders, and pen & paper before them).

On a related note, this post from Jenny Levine indicates to me that there’s a parallel concern regarding Second Life, which a number of 2.0 librarian types are heavily involved in, and which possibly comes as close to virtual reality/Futureworld as anything else (and thus highly attractive to and necessary for young people). Even ALA’s president elect is on board!

We don’t address Second Life (or Stickam) specifically in our podcast, but both are clearly to be noted.

Online Social Networking and Intellectual Freedom">Online Social Networking and Intellectual Freedom

In his article DOPA Dies on the Vine, Andy Carvin notes

“For a time, it seemed that DOPA would inevitably reach the president’s desk. Surely the overwhelming support of the House would be reflected in the Senate, one might have surmised. But then, something quite unexpected happened: nothing. With all the criticism being lobbed by the blogosphere and the media, DOPA found itself among a group of skeptical senators who were in no rush to pass the legislation. After it passed the House, influential Senator Patrick Leahy expressed concerns with DOPA, and media reports suggested he would take a long, hard look at the bill, effectively slowing it down. Individual senators have greater power than House members to slow legislative processes, and critics like Leahy could choose to take advantage of this.”

See also ALA’s wiki on Interactive Web applications, OIF’s Online Social Networks, and Mary Minow’s Great insights on the death of DOPA.

On the link above, or on Online Social Networking and Intellectual Freedom, you will find a podcast, Online Social Networking and Intellectual Freedom. If you require assistance to listen to the podcast, please begin at the page Online Social Networking and Intellectual Freedom.

Welcome to the OIF blog!

Welcome to the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom blog! Our blog will feature alerts, articles, commentary, links, news, and more, to expand our ability to fulfill our mission: to implement ALA policies concerning the concept of intellectual freedom as embodied in the Library Bill of Rights. Our goal—for nearly 40 years!—is to educate librarians and the general public about the nature and importance of intellectual freedom in libraries.

Reader commentary, opinion, and reaction to posts are welcome and encouraged. Comments should be relevant to the specific post to which they are attached.

We believe in the importance of promoting and preserving the freedom to seek, hold, receive, and disseminate ideas. We trust our blog will help us do just that. Let us know how we’re doing at oif@ala.org!

— Judith F. Krug, Deb Caldwell-Stone, Erin Byrne, Don Wood, Nanette Perez, Jonathan Kelley, Bryan Campbell